Ahang wrote:
 
> I wouldn't assume the Guardian felt 'ethically bound'
> by those standards of scholarship which binds us academics.
Susan Maneck wrote:

Academics has nothing to do with it.  Any ethical person knows that one can't put words in someone else's mouth.  
Would Ahang and Susan please elaborate on their remarks?
I'm a little confused.
Was someone trying to put words in someone else's mouth?
__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to