On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:02:48 -0600, Susan Maneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gilberto: > "The whole passage already looked sinister as is. I didn't remove any > mitigating context." Susan: > Yes, you did. You left out the parts that make that passage make sense. Gilberto: Go back and look at the original post. I had put in the entire passage uncut. And then I posted again with the parts which were Orwellian. Gilberto: > "The specific examples given fall in those categories but there is no > statement which explicitly puts a limit on what could be included in > "righteous purpose"." Susan: > So? He gives the most reasonable examples there are and you call that > Orwellian? Gilberto: No. What's Orwellian are the specific part of the passage which I called Orwellian. Peace Gilberto "My people are hydroponic" __________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
