In a message dated 7/31/2005 2:12:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for the Bible, as you know, I know it. The stoning incident is an --------------------
Question. -- Is the ablution of baptism useful and necessary, or is it
useless and unnecessary? In the first case, if it is useful, why was it
abrogated? And in the second case, if it is useless, why did John practice
it?
Answer. -- The change in conditions, alterations and transformations are
necessities of the essence of beings, and essential necessities cannot be
separated from the reality of things. So it is absolutely impossible to separate
heat from fire, humidity from water, or light from the sun, for they are
essential necessities. As the change and alteration of conditions are
necessities for beings, so laws also are changed and altered in accordance with
the changes and alterations of the times. For example, in the time of Moses, His
Law was conformed and adapted to the conditions of the time; but in the days of
Christ these conditions had changed and altered to such an extent that the
Mosaic Law was no longer suited and adapted to the needs of mankind; and it was,
therefore, abrogated. Thus it was that Christ broke the Sabbath and forbade
divorce. After Christ four disciples, among whom were Peter and Paul, permitted
the use of animal food forbidden by the Bible, except the eating of those
animals which had been strangled, or which were sacrificed to idols, and of
blood.[1] They also forbade fornication. They maintained these four
commandments. Afterward, Paul permitted even the eating of strangled animals,
those sacrificed to idols, and blood, and only maintained the prohibition of
fornication. 94 So in chapter 14, verse 14 of his Epistle to the
Romans, Paul writes: "I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is
nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to
him it is unclean."
[1 Acts 15:20.] Also in the Epistle of Paul to Titus, chapter 1, verse 15: "Unto the pure
all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing
pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled."
Now this change, these alterations and this abrogation are due to the
impossibility of comparing the time of Christ with that of Moses. The conditions
and requirements in the later period were entirely changed and altered. The
former laws were, therefore, abrogated.
The existence of the world may be compared to that of a man, and the
Prophets and Messengers of God to skillful doctors. The human being cannot
remain in one condition: different maladies occur which have each a special
remedy. The skillful physician does not give the same medicine to cure each
disease and each malady, but he changes remedies and medicines according to the
different necessities of the diseases and constitutions. One person may have a
severe illness caused by fever, and the skilled doctor will give him cooling
remedies; and when at some other time the condition of this person has changed,
and fever is replaced by chills, without doubt the skilled doctor will discard
cooling medicine and permit the use of heating drugs. This change and alteration
is required by the condition of the patient and is an evident proof of the skill
of the physician.
Consider, could the Law of the Old Testament be enforced at this epoch and
time? No, in the name of God! it would be impossible and impracticable;
therefore, most certainly God abrogated the laws of the Old Testament at the
time of Christ. Reflect, also, that baptism in the days of John the Baptist was
used to awaken and admonish the 95 people to repent from all sin,
and to watch for the appearance of the Kingdom of Christ. But at present in
Asia, the Catholics and the Orthodox Church plunge newly born children into
water mixed with olive oil, and many of them become ill from the shock; at the
time of baptism they struggle and become agitated. In other places, the clergy
sprinkle the water of baptism on the forehead. But neither from the first form
nor from the second do the children derive any spiritual benefit. Then what
result is obtained from this form? Other peoples are amazed and wonder why the
infant is plunged into the water, since this is neither the cause of the
spiritual awakening of the child, nor of its faith or conversion, but it is only
a custom which is followed. In the time of John the Baptist it was not so; no,
at first John used to exhort the people, and to guide them to repentance from
sin, and to fill them with the desire to await the manifestation of Christ.
Whoever received the ablution of baptism, and repented of sins in absolute
humility and meekness, would also purify and cleanse his body from outward
impurities. With perfect yearning, night and day, he would constantly wait for
the manifestation of Christ, and the entrance to the Kingdom of the Spirit of
God.[1]
[1 I.e., of Christ, Whom the Muslims frequently designate by the title of Ruhu'llah, the Spirit of God.] To recapitulate: our meaning is that the change and modification of
conditions, and the altered requirements of different centuries and times, are
the cause of the abrogation of laws. For a time comes when these laws are no
longer suitably adapted to conditions. Consider how very different are the
requirements of the first centuries, of the Middle Ages, and of modern times. Is
it possible that the laws of the first centuries could be enforced at present?
It is evident that it would be impossible and impracticable. In the same manner,
after the lapse of a few centuries, the requirements of the present time will
not be the same as 96 those of the future, and certainly there will
be change and alteration. In Europe the laws are unceasingly altered and
modified; in bygone years, how many laws existed in the organizations and
systems of Europe, which are now abrogated! These changes and alterations are
due to the variation and mutation of thought, conditions and customs. If it were
not so, the prosperity of the world of humanity would be wrecked.
For example, there is in the Pentateuch a law that if anyone break the
Sabbath, he shall be put to death. Moreover, there are ten sentences of death in
the Pentateuch. Would it be possible to keep these laws in our time? It is clear
that it would be absolutely impossible. Consequently, there are changes and
modifications in the laws, and these are a sufficient proof of the supreme
wisdom of God.
This subject needs deep thought. Then the cause of these changes will be
evident and apparent.
Blessed are those who reflect! 97
(Abdu'l-Baha, Some Answered Questions, p. 96)
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu |
- Re: Quran reading questions Popeyesays
- Re: Quran reading questions Ursus Maximus
- Quran reading questions Ursus Maximus
- Re: Quran reading questions Gilberto Simpson
- RE: Quran reading questions Susan Maneck