On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:14:29 +0000 (UTC), Freddy Vulto wrote: > [..] maybe we'd better release bash_completion-2 (or ..200902xx) [..]
I was starting a branch for the release process... what version number you believe is "sane"? I'd start at 1.0, (so as not to be necessarily linked to the bash version), and the "date" format is kinda weird to me. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel
