On 2012-04-21 18:41, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Still, I don't see the point in avoiding 'git_complete' and making our > lifes more difficult.
I'm not aware of ways it'd make people's lifes more difficult, but if git_complete is a function intended for completion purposes, I'd personally not name it git* because it'd interfere for example with completing git<TAB> by being included in the suggested completions even though it's never meant to be used that way. Prefixing for example with underscore doesn't avoid the problem completely, but makes it less likely to happen. _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel
