2012/4/21 Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi>: > On 2012-04-21 18:41, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> Still, I don't see the point in avoiding 'git_complete' and making our >> lifes more difficult. > > I'm not aware of ways it'd make people's lifes more difficult, but if > git_complete is a function intended for completion purposes, I'd > personally not name it git* because it'd interfere for example with > completing git<TAB> by being included in the suggested completions even > though it's never meant to be used that way. Prefixing for example with > underscore doesn't avoid the problem completely, but makes it less > likely to happen.
That's actually a good point, I forgot that functions are also completed. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel
