Hi Cor, On 24/02/2022 12:41, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi all,Paolo Vecchi wrote on 24/02/2022 09:06:On 24/02/2022 03:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote:All of us read and accepted to be bound by the current version of the CoI Policy by being a member of the Board of Directors. I believe no one in the current board has any problem with it or wouldn't have ran for a board position.How do you suggest we move this forward then? The current state of the policy is still considered not ok for some.Life can be so complicated at times ;) I do not see a reason not to support the small improvements that are in.
It always depends on the point of view. Some may call them improvements others may call them weakening of a policy. That isn't any way the main point.
Surely all the member of the board read and accepted to be bound by the current CoI Policy as nobody complained about it when agreed to be a BoD member.
We could accept those changes (if everyone actually understood their implications within the meaning of the whole policy) or, as they are minor, just let the MC do it's job and then harmonise the policies so changes may not even be needed right now.
Cheers, Cor
Ciao Paolo -- Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
