I think it's just a typo and ten_gbe_v2 == 10_gbe_v2
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Nimish Sane <nimishs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave and others,
>
> I was under the impression that "ten_Gbe_v2" was suppose to support ROACH2
> as well. At least, its mask supports parameters specific to ROACH2 (such as
> choice between CX4, SFP+ and ports etc.). Rather, these options are
> available in the mask only for ROACH2.
>
> Is "10_Gbe_v2" part of SKA-SA github repository now and is that supposed to
> be used instead of "ten_Gbe_v2"? I have not updated the repository of late
> and have been using ten_Gbe_v2 for my ROACH2 design.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nimish
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David MacMahon <dav...@astro.berkeley.edu>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, John,
>>
>> My current work is on ROACH2 and the "10_Gbe_v2" block is the only 10 GbE
>> block supported on ROACH2 so that's the one I'm currently designing with
>> (but not yet using myself). I'm not sure which block Christopher used in
>> the packet generator. His design ran on a ROACH so it could have been using
>> the "ten_GbE" or "ten_Gbe_v2" block.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:01 PM, John Ford wrote:
>>
>> >> Hi, John,
>> >>
>> >> The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was
>> >> visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library
>> >> version he used, but I can find out.
>> >
>> > It was mostly just curiosity on my part, but are you using the same
>> > blocks
>> > for your work?
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Dave
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Hi, Rich,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8
>> >>>> Gbps
>> >>>> aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping
>> >>>> any
>> >>>> packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit
>> >>>> only"
>> >>>> (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH).
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> John
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hope this helps,
>> >>>> Dave
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi All,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a
>> >>>>> sustained
>> >>>>> data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>> Rich
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
