>> >> 1) They’re client aka desktop SSDs, not “enterprise” >> 2) They’re a partition of a larger OSD shared with other purposes > > Yup. They're a mix of SATA SSDs and NVMes, but everything is > consumer-grade. They're only 10% full on average and I'm not > super-concerned with performance. If they did get full I'd allocate > more space for them. Performance is more than adequate for the very > light loads they have.
Fair enough. We sometimes see people bringing a toothpick to a gun fight and expecting a different result, so I had to ask. Just keep an eye on their endurance burn. > > > It is interesting because Quincy had no issues with the autoscaler > with the exact same cluster config. It might be a Rook issue, or it > might just be because so many PGs are remapped. I'll take another > look at that once it reaches more of a steady state. > > In any case, if the balancer is designed more for equal-sized OSDs I > can always just play with reweights to balance things. Look into the JJ balancer, I’ve read good things about it. > > -- > Rich _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
