You can ask the monitor to dump its sessions (which should expose the IPs and the release / features) you can then track down by IP those with the undesirable features/release
ceph daemon mon.`hostname -s` sessions Assuming your mon is named after the short hostname, you may need to do this for every mon. Alternatively using the `ceph tell mon.* sessions` to hit every mon at once. Respectfully, *Wes Dillingham* w...@wesdillingham.com LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46 AM Anthony D'Atri <anthony.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > [rook@rook-ceph-tools-5ff8d58445-gkl5w .aws]$ ceph features > { > "mon": [ > { > "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", > "release": "luminous", > "num": 3 > } > ], > "osd": [ > { > "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", > "release": "luminous", > "num": 600 > } > ], > "client": [ > { > "features": "0x2f018fb87aa4aafe", > "release": "luminous", > "num": 41 > }, > { > "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", > "release": "luminous", > "num": 147 > } > ], > "mgr": [ > { > "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", > "release": "luminous", > "num": 2 > } > ] > } > [rook@rook-ceph-tools-5ff8d58445-gkl5w .aws]$ > > IIRC there are nuances, there are case where a client can *look* like > Jewel but actually be okay. > > > > On Dec 21, 2023, at 10:41, Simon Oosthoek <simon.oosth...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Our cluster is currently running quincy, and I want to set the minimal > > client version to luminous, to enable upmap balancer, but when I tried > to, > > I got this: > > > > # ceph osd set-require-min-compat-client luminous Error EPERM: cannot set > > require_min_compat_client to luminous: 2 connected client(s) look like > > jewel (missing 0x800000000000000); add --yes-i-really-mean-it to do it > > anyway > > > > I think I know the most likely candidate (and I've asked them), but is > > there a way to find out, the way ceph seems to know? > > > > tnx > > > > /Simon > > -- > > I'm using my gmail.com address, because the gmail.com dmarc policy is > > "none", some mail servers will reject this (microsoft?) others will > instead > > allow this when I send mail to a mailling list which has not yet been > > configured to send mail "on behalf of" the sender, but rather do a kind > of > > "forward". The latter situation causes dkim/dmarc failures and the dmarc > > policy will be applied. see https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC for more > details > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
