On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:12:36 -0400 Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well -- correct me if I am wrong, but the irony of the situation is that > suspend/wakeup is handled by the kernel, and qtopia images use stock > kernel from OM. Thus whatever suspend/resume achievements you see - they > are solely due to OM developers. Then thanks to the OM devs for this! > qtopia relevant pros though: call/receive after resume, absent explicit > wake up on GSM activity, etc indeed are nice and it is really strange > that OM's images are "not yet there" since qtopia proves that kernel > part is good enough already (not to say that ASU/2008.2 are based on > qtopia) I'm pretty confident, that in the next half year Om will be at least on the same level as qtopia is (and in some points further). I can't wait to develop applications for the Om but at the moment I feel a bit lost with it because there's no api-documentation, no basic ui you want to or can develop for. If Om will have a base to work on it will grow very very fast! But at the moment I dunno what to do with it because the basics are not working. But as said I'm pretty confident that those problems will be solved. > and what you experience is 'white screen of death' -- you might search > for it -- there is bug report somewhere Yes found it, thanks for pointing me to this.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
