On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:49:47 GMT, Doug Simon <dnsi...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Libgraal is compiled ahead of time and should not need any JVMCI Java code 
>> to be dynamically loaded at runtime. Prior to this PR, this is not the case 
>> due to:
>> 
>> * Code to copy system properties from the HotSpot heap into the libgraal 
>> heap. This is in 
>> `jdk.vm.ci.services.Services.initializeSavedProperties(byte[])` and 
>> `jdk.vm.ci.services.Services.serializeSavedProperties()`. This code should 
>> be moved to `java.base/jdk.internal.vm.VMSupport`.
>> * Code to translate exceptions from the HotSpot heap into the libgraal heap 
>> and vice versa. This code should be moved from 
>> `jdk.internal.vm.ci//jdk.vm.ci.hotspot.TranslatedException` to 
>> `java.base/jdk.internal.vm.VMSupport`.
>> 
>> This PR makes the above changes. As a result, it's possible to build a JDK 
>> image that includes (and uses) libgraal but does not include 
>> `jdk.internal.vm.ci` or `jdk.internal.vm.compiler`. This both reduces 
>> footprint and better isolates the JAVMCI and the Graal compiler as accessing 
>> these components from Java code is now impossible.
>
> Doug Simon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
> by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 14 additional commits since 
> the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'openjdk-jdk/master' into JDK-8298099
>  - formatting to avoid very long lines [skip ci]
>  - removed debug code [skip ci]
>  - clarify Properties filtering [skip ci]
>  - remove debug code [skip ci]
>  - incorporate review feedback [skip ci]
>  - removed hard-coded module name [skip ci]
>  - renamed is_module_resolvable to is_module_observable
>  - share code to create the exploded path for a module and avoid stack-based 
> variable length array
>  - generalized ClassLoader::has_jvmci_module to is_module_resolvable
>  - ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/fbca1fb5...f5219b20

Sorry I checked with Alan over Slack who said to go ahead with merging.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11513

Reply via email to