-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/21/99 10:30:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>so get on the
>
>right side of this issue and quit fooling yourself into thinking that it's
>
>so "complex." . .. Sorry for confusing you again with Kris Mulligan --
Howdy Jim,
Crawl out from your rock again? Gee, you never answered my last questions. But
here ya are popping up and spouting your dogmatic baalooney.
So if'n we jist get right side of the issue them we's ok, hunh? And you know
the right side, cuz your digmatic thinking says so. Abortion is a designed
issue to divide the populace. Look at the private actions of many of the
'designated' leaders and you will not find the actions that back-up the
rhetoric. Abortion is fact of nature, it happens and if a group of people can
use the issue to divide our society, they will and have. Shill games for
shallow dogmatics and ignorant fears.
In a message dated 2/21/99 9:13:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In fact,
>
>most people on this list (that contribute anyway) would probably be happy
>
>with Scaife's real agenda which is population control and "improving" of the
>
>human race through gene splicing, etc. Jim Condit Jr.
Broad bush bashing, again? Wrong and if you are going to make accusations
please back them with some facts. Your rhetoric is really quite trite,
boring, telling and ignorant.
In a message dated 2/21/99 9:48:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In fact, I don't have
>
>enough knowledge of all the Hawk wrote to totally evaluate your decision to
>
>terminate him, but the clarity of thought embodied in Hawk's posts, and in
>
>Mr. Moxley's, and in some others, are what I find sorely lacking in most
>
>posts on this list. Jim Condit Jr.
Again, you bring your veneration of ole hypocrite hawk, and your desire to
focus discuss on the rules of the list.
Got a problem?
In a message dated 2/21/99 9:52:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Dear Teo -- the Reptilian post has nothing to do with WWII Holocaust
>
>discussion -- my point was simply that this line of inquiry -- which I've
>
>heard about elsewhere and quite frankly find interesting to read (in small
>
>bits) in the same way as Art Bell is interesting to listen to sometime -- my
>
>point is that it's a LOT more absurd than discussion on ANY side or ANGLE of
>
>the Holocaust discussion possibly could be. Sorry, I couldn't resist. Jim
>
>Condit Jr.
Again your point is?
There is much discussion of the holocaust all over the net. Go to nizkor, MHO.
So Jim, If we did discuss the Holocaust, just what would you say?
Om
K
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
