Hi Eric,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:27:58AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Tassia Camoes Araujo <tas...@acaia.ca>
> > wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:24:06AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > > We could have a meeting tomorrow, but attendance is often low when a
> > > meeting is announced on such short notice. I would suggest trying to
> > > settle on a schedule today, then set and announce the next meeting for
> > > next week.
> > I see your point, but this is not a new meeting.
>
> I didn't understand that. Sorry and nevermind. :)
>
Sorry, English is not my best friend that late at night ;-)
I was just trying to contrast this with the situation where we need to find a
convenient time for an adhoc ("new") meeting. In the present case the meetings
were already happening, we were just re-evaluating the time. That's why I don't
think it is "short notice". Otherwise I would agree with you, short notice
calls are usually problematic.
Cheers,
Tassia.
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
