On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:28:00AM -0400, Tassia Camoes Araujo wrote: > Hi Eric, > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:27:58AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Tassia Camoes Araujo > > > <tas...@acaia.ca> wrote: Hi Eric, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at > > > 10:24:06AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > > > > We could have a meeting tomorrow, but attendance is often > > > > low when a meeting is announced on such short notice. I > > > > would suggest trying to settle on a schedule today, then set > > > > and announce the next meeting for next week. > > > I see your point, but this is not a new meeting. > > I didn't understand that. Sorry and nevermind. :) > Sorry, English is not my best friend that late at night ;-)
No worries. > I was just trying to contrast this with the situation where we need to > find a convenient time for an adhoc ("new") meeting. In the present > case the meetings were already happening, we were just re-evaluating > the time. That's why I don't think it is "short notice". Otherwise I > would agree with you, short notice calls are usually problematic. Yes, I understand now. -Eric _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team