Hi, On Wednesday 24 September 2008 20:37, Ben Armstrong wrote: > I am quite opposed to just going back to "Debian subprojects" because > then we lose the distinction altogether that we're trying to make. The > idea that when you set out to make a "Debian-derived distribution", if > you follow the CDD approach, you and your users are much better off is > very hard to express if you don't have a name for the alternative.
what _is_ the CDD approach?
regards,
Holger </innocent look>
pgpD5D1mPj79r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
