On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/CDDNamingProposals#head-28e0bfc23ab009f3ecb4e464e56e81f4009033b8 > > Perhaps we need listed on this page examples of subprojects that > are in Debian that are *not* thingy1 (and don't fall in the categories > thingy2 or thingy3) since there seems to be some confusion here. I don't see how thingy1 aren't Debian subprojects. > Have a look at: > > http://www.us.debian.org/devel/ > > Notice the "projects" listed there that are not on the shorter list of > CDDs beneath it. I don't think there is any reason for that split, indeed, most of the CDDs there say "Debian foo Project". > I am quite opposed to just going back to "Debian subprojects" because > then we lose the distinction altogether that we're trying to make. The > idea that when you set out to make a "Debian-derived distribution", if > you follow the CDD approach, you and your users are much better off is > very hard to express if you don't have a name for the alternative. Could you explain what the distinction between CDDs/thingy1 and what you understand from the term "Debian subprojects" was meant to be and what the purpose of the distinction? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]