Didier Raboud schrieb: > Bastian Venthur wrote: >> What I'd like to see is a solution where unstable is *never* frozen, >> maybe by replacing the current frozen unstable with something temporary >> and putting it between unstable and testing, where all the fixes go >> while all the new stuff can still go into unstable but cannot enter the >> next step while we're in the freeze: >> >> Normal: >> >> experimental || unstable > testing > stable >> >> Freeze: >> >> experimental || unstable || $something frozen > testing > stable >> >> Basicly we already have this with: >> >> experimental || unstable > testing > stable > > Something like > > experimental || unstable-be || unstable-pt > testing >> stable > > with: > > experimental Real sandbox/playground/if-your-box-breaks-its-your-own-fault > unstable-be Bleeding-Edge Constantly updated to "newest upstream" > unstable-pt Pre-Testing Last "considered long-time and stable" > upstream > Bug-fixing, actual "unstable" > testing as actually Future Stable > > ?
Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important thing is, that unstable is never frozen, but temporarily disconnected from the unstable > testing > stable flow. Another way to see it is that unstable is constantly flowing and we're just forking a stable distribution from it from time to time. Cheers, Bastian -- Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de Debian Developer venthur at debian org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org