Le Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:11:58PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 02:07:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:41:17AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > > > a generalized approach is needed. > > > > Multiple versions of a package seems undesirable to me, for the same > > > reasons as static libraries and embedded code copies are undesirable. > > > Hi Paul and everybody, > > > it would be a great advantage for Debian over the other distributions to > > have > > the capacity to install multiple versions concurrently. > > No, no it wouldn't. > > This is how rpm handles library packages. It's a horror show.
Hi Steve, we have been fighting bitterly over the years, we have different points of view, and it does not seem like we will be thiking along the same lines anytime soon. When you post on debian-devel or other lists and I disagree, I try to refrain myself from juping on the keyboard and to instead give time to others to express their disagreement. If nobody answers, I also take it as a sign that I probably should not answer as well. Could I ask you to do the same for me ? Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140426052944.gd15...@falafel.plessy.net