3 octobre 2022 11:11 "Santiago Ruano Rincón" <santiag...@riseup.net> a écrit: > El 02/10/22 a las 20:42, Michael Biebl escribió: >> Am 02.10.22 um 20:14 schrieb Luca Boccassi: >> On Sun, 2022-10-02 at 10:52 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> In Bullseye we changed the name/syntax for the security repository, and >> for that a mention in the release notes was enough, no? Isn't this a >> very similar situation? >> >> The main difference is, that the renaming caused an error message by apt, so >> you knew something needed to be fixed. >> >> For this particular change, there will be no error. So yes, I have the same >> fear as Russ that this particular change might go unnoticed. > > Couldn't we handle this via transitional firware* non-free packages, > that depend on bookworm non-free-firmware packages?
That would only work if we renamed all concerned binary packages, or if apt grew a "section/packagename" syntax (which would be bizarre).
