>>     Packages which contain perl modules should provide virtual packages
>>     that correspond to the primary module or modules in the package. The
>>     naming convention is that for module 'Foo::Bar', the package should
>>     provide 'libfoo-bar-perl'. This may be used as the package's name if
>>     the result is not too long and cumbersome. Or the package's name may
>>     be an abbreviated version, and the longer name put in the Provides
>>     field.

I dont see a benefit in this at all. It just adds confusion for the sake
of "short package names". Especially as you shouldnt (build)-depend on
virtual packages, so those would need to use the shorter names
too. Having the direct "x::y is libx-y-perl" is IMO more important than
less to type in.

-- 
bye Joerg
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/How_to_win_an_argument

Attachment: pgpclkfGXmapW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to