On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 12:36:07PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The rest looks good and I agree that such a source is useful, but it > > should also be allowed to refer to a central document like > > /u/s/d/dpatch/README.source. I expect that many README.source look the > > same. > > I don't think that needs any change to the above wording. If > README.source refers to another existing file that documents those things, > that seems to me to satisfy the above. Although I suppose we could > explicitly add something like "The instructions may refer to a > documentation file installed by one of the package build dependencies, > provided that it clearly explains these tasks and isn't a general > reference manual."
That seems like a good idea, actually; not because I expect people won't refer to other documents in the absense of such a clause, but rather because I feel it to be quite likely that they _will_ refer to general reference manuals otherwise. Thanks, -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
