On Sun, 2023-10-22 at 21:12 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 22-10-2023 15:58, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Adding owner to the loop: Don, any idea what caused the RC bugs > > export > > to miss all the non-pseudo package RC bugs? Would it be possible to > > fail > > the export in such a case instead of providing partial RC bug data? > > 2023-10-10 > > [20:28:26] <elbrus> why, o why did this migrate to testing despite an > RC > bug https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcleri > [20:28:39] <elbrus> I know the package and the bug.... > [20:29:03] <elbrus> seems like britney got confused yesterday > [20:29:55] <elbrus> same for gitaly > > It seems to have occurred more than once. So yes, we need a stronger > guard against this. >
FWIW I'm not spotting any obviously wrongly-sized bugscan files around then, looking on buxtehude. Regards, Adam
