On Sun, January 16, 2011 14:41, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:30:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> On Sun, January 16, 2011 00:28, Philipp Kern wrote: >> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> >> ia32-libs-gtk: >> > Looks ok'ish. I'll do a final review once it hits the queue, though, >> > so please go ahead. >> On its way to the queue. > > is there a reason why there are old sources of glib2.0 and pango1.0 > included?
This is because of the way the current packaging scripts work and I didn't change anything besides refresh the packages. The security archive contains the -5+lenny1 version and the regular archive contains -6. The script fetches both sources but as you'll see in the end only the -6 binary ends up in the package. So it's basically the extra source that is cached. I could remove them by hand if you want after the fetch stage; it seems however desirable to only refresh the packages for stable uploads and not to be changing the packaging itself. In any case this only affects the source package. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/346edb3e3e742916bca11deb154eea2e.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl