On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 03:14:02PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sun, January 16, 2011 14:41, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:30:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> >> On Sun, January 16, 2011 00:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> >> >> ia32-libs-gtk:
> >> > Looks ok'ish.  I'll do a final review once it hits the queue, though,
> >> > so please go ahead.
> >> On its way to the queue.
> > is there a reason why there are old sources of glib2.0 and pango1.0
> > included?
> This is because of the way the current packaging scripts work and I didn't
> change anything besides refresh the packages.
> 
> The security archive contains the -5+lenny1 version and the regular
> archive contains -6. The script fetches both sources but as you'll see in
> the end only the -6 binary ends up in the package. So it's basically the
> extra source that is cached.

Yep, that's ok then because I'm able to fetch it from another archive
(security) to verify it.  Flagged for accept on the next dinstall.

You can go ahead with the upload of the beast (ia32-libs), too.

Kind regards and thanks
Philipp Kern

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to