Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> schrieb: > I would be grateful for an informal summary of why proposal F is thought > to be needed on the ballot in addition to proposal C. What is thought > not captured well by Sam's text, but is thought to be captured well by > Martin's text?
>From my PoV: - Less ambigious, C only talks about service units and preferring other facilities "if they have clear and obvious advantages" (but we have no good method to clarify whether e.g. systemd-sysusers fulfills that over adduser), while F actively endorses tight integration. - F is more expressive in terms of why to focus on systemd (like to collaborate with the 99% of the FLOSS world who settled on systemd) than C. Cheers, Moritz