* Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> [2019-11-30 11:48]: > - Less ambigious, C only talks about service units and preferring other > facilities "if they have clear and obvious advantages" (but we have no > good method to clarify whether e.g. systemd-sysusers fulfills that over > adduser), while F actively endorses tight integration.
FWIW, while F endores endorses tight integration, I added a "where appropriate" to allow for some flexibility. I wanted to keep proposal F high-level and leave the exact implementation details to -devel and -policy. > - F is more expressive in terms of why to focus on systemd (like to > collaborate with the 99% of the FLOSS world who settled on systemd) than > C. Yeah, as I just explained in my other email, I found C lacking of sway, vision, passion, or whatever you may call it. -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/