+1 (non-binding) Great to see this happening, hope we will see more proposals towards making Airflow more flexible!
Regards, Igor On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 8:10 PM Daniel Standish <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > It doesn’t affect my vote on the API, but I am very strongly against this > > one part of the AIP: > > > … dag_id are namespaced with `<team>:` prefix. > > This specific part is getting an implementation/code veto from me. We > made > > the mistake of overloading one column to store multiple things in Airflow > > before, and I’ve dealt with the fallout in other apps in the past. Trust > > me: do. not. do. this. > > I agree with Ash's sentiment. Is adding a tenant_id or something so > unpalatable? >
