> On 1 Dec 2016, at 04:23, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > Even as httpd is operating under paralysis by analysis, we are long past a > year since the last releases. > > Is there anything holding up the jumps to 1.6, or 2.0? > > I'd personally like to see an API harmonising memcache to redis, but that > can't possibly be a showstopper to any incremental release. > > If nobody else offers, I'll T&R 1.6 objects in 72 or so hours for a vote, > alongside the first 2.0 RC. > > Feedback welcomed.
OK, now I recollect why the only APR I’ve touched in years is trunk. The 1.x APR/APR_UTIL tree appears to be in limbo, with no trunk of its own. We have branches/1.6 serving as a trunk-substitute, and 1.5 in an indeterminate state (Is it active? Are backports relevant? Is that tumbleweed in the cracks?) Bill, I take it branches/1.6 is the current focus for all backports? Is anyone taking an interest in updating the website to reflect where we are and reduce confusion? If not, I’ll have a go. — Nick Kew
