Proceeding with the understanding that mak, and dsp files are OK on -dev, thank you for the review in your schema, Steffen!
Cheers, Bill On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: > No issues seen with building and running httpd with apr 1.6.3 and apr-util > 1.6.1 > > > On Monday 25/09/2017 at 21:34, Steffen wrote: > > No, used 1.6.2/1.6.0. > > Tomorrow (already late here) I can try 1.6.3-dev and 1.6.1-dev. > > > Op 25 sep. 2017 om 20:52 heeft William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi Steffen, > > were you testing 1.6.x branches of apr (1.6.3-dev) and apr-util (1.6.1-dev)? > Or the last released 1.6.2/1.6.0 flavors? > > I'm reviewing here to avoid tagging something that won't build, if you > had already > done so for Windows, it would speed things up here. > > Cheers, > > Bill > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: > On Windows it does not build out of the box. > > Missing modules/core include for mod_watchdog.h in > mod_proxy_balancer.dsp/mak and libhttp.dsp/mak . Did not checked cmake. > > Steffen > > On Monday 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. > > Vote will last the normal 72 hrs. > > NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience. > > Thx! > > > >
