Thanks for your work, Stamatis. As for 1581, I have reviewed it and it looks good to me. So I am +1 for the change.
Best, Chunwei On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:39 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see that Chunwei has reviewed 1581 and he gave a +1 so I suppose it is > ready to go. > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 7:27 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Sounds good. > > * I am reviewing 3122 and will commit shortly. > > * I see Danny has asked me to final review 2302. I'll do that tomorrow. > > * Who owns 1581? > > > > Julian > > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:28 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > According to the discussion in JIRA the following issues seem to be > very > > > close to been resolved: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581 > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302 > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122 > > > > > > I will wait for those to be merged and then I will start the release > > > process. I would like to kindly ask the reviewers involved to check > that > > > there is nothing more left to do. > > > > > > I will start moving the remaining issues to 1.22.0. Let me know if > there > > is > > > anything else that we should include in this release. > > > > > > Best, > > > Stamatis > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 11:04 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig). > > > > > > > > > On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis < > zabe...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked > for > > > > > 1.21.0 [1]. > > > > > > > > > > From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important: > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581 > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302 > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122 > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224 > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228 > > > > > > > > > > I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get > > them > > > > in. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yuzhao....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support > > into > > > > >> 1.21 ! > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706 > > > > >> > > > > >> Best, > > > > >> Danny Chan > > > > >> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28，Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com > > >，写道： > > > > >>> Hi all, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release > > (Calcite > > > > >>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next > > > > release > > > > >>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to > have > > an > > > > RC > > > > >>> around the 20 of August. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you > > can > > > > >>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 > > but we > > > > do > > > > >>> have many pull requests. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and > > for > > > > >> those > > > > >>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set > > the fix > > > > >>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing > > and > > > > >>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and > > commercial > > > > >>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not > already > > > > done > > > > >>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set > > the > > > > fix > > > > >>> version to 1.21.0. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in > > FIFO > > > > >> order. > > > > >>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged > > to > > > > >>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not > > > > >> convenient > > > > >>> for you! > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Best, > > > > >>> Stamatis > > > > >>> > > > > >>> [1] > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
