[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17480968#comment-17480968
 ] 

Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-2213:
-------------------------------------

Reopened and marked "resolved" which is how we managed tickets for releases. It 
will be closed as part of the release process itself. This makes finding 
tickets easier e.g. https://s.apache.org/jena-4.4.0-jira 

As I understand the current state, we're waiting for updated tests making the 
tests more appropriate for OSGB.

PR #1169 did a basic upgrade and simply updated the results of the affected 
tests without assessment for suitability.

We will be at SIS 1.1 for Jena 4.4.0.

[~neumarcx] - I will leave whether you want a separate ticket for the test 
improvements, or use this one.


> Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-2213
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: GeoSPARQL
>    Affects Versions: Jena 4.2.0
>         Environment: SIS 1.1
>            Reporter: Marco Neumann
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Jena 4.4.0
>
>         Attachments: Diff-SIS-1.1
>
>
> The Jena automated tests fail after upgrading from SIS 1.0 to SIS 1.1. The 
> project members in SIS believe that in SIS 1.1 the "Transverse Mercator" 
> projection, whose formulas have been modified in SIS 1.1 for better stability 
> may cause this failure.
> {code:java}
> ERROR] Failures:
> [ERROR]   SRSInfoTest.testBuildDomainEnvelope_OSGB36:104 
> expected:<Env[-118397.00138845091 : 751441.7790901454, -16627.734375018626 : 
> 1272149.3463499574]> but was:<Env[-104009.35713717458 : 688806.0073395987, 
> -16627.734528041445 : 1256558.4455361878]>
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to