[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17481005#comment-17481005
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-2213:
-------------------------------------
No - I have not taken the values from your comment. The PR was made several
days earlier.
The project normally works with github pull requests. We accept patches/diffs
on tickets (some people do not wish to use github).
Please read back - I have explained how to attach a diff *as a file* to a JIRA
issue. Screen scraping diffs from text comments is time-consuming, fragile and
error-prone.
The diff needs recreating relative to current the Jena codebase and will need
to only touch the tests. The POM update has been done.
Release are a busy time. I am now able to do the release as-and-when I have
time, and whether or not there are updated jena-geosparql tests.
> Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-2213
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: GeoSPARQL
> Affects Versions: Jena 4.2.0
> Environment: SIS 1.1
> Reporter: Marco Neumann
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 4.4.0
>
> Attachments: Diff-SIS-1.1
>
>
> The Jena automated tests fail after upgrading from SIS 1.0 to SIS 1.1. The
> project members in SIS believe that in SIS 1.1 the "Transverse Mercator"
> projection, whose formulas have been modified in SIS 1.1 for better stability
> may cause this failure.
> {code:java}
> ERROR] Failures:
> [ERROR] SRSInfoTest.testBuildDomainEnvelope_OSGB36:104
> expected:<Env[-118397.00138845091 : 751441.7790901454, -16627.734375018626 :
> 1272149.3463499574]> but was:<Env[-104009.35713717458 : 688806.0073395987,
> -16627.734528041445 : 1256558.4455361878]>
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
