Dear Sergio, I'm sorry I can't understand you questions. It's appreciated if you can help me clarify these:
1) If what changes in the new alternative CDI service is just the invocations to the RepositoryConnection (I'd need to check the diff to really assert that), would it still make sense to you to provide an alternative CDIservice? What do you mean by the "new alternative CDI service", and "an alternative CDIservice"? I'm now translating the CDI service (LdpServiceImpl) into SPARQL implementation. If anything changes, I can translate it accordingly. Is that enough? 2) Or would be more maintainable to move the translation into an RepositoryConnection wrapper or something like that? What's "an RepositoryConnection wrapper"? Why do we need that (i.e. why more maintainable )? Can you show me an example? Thanks! Best regards, Qihong Lin On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Dear Qihong Lin, > > > On 27/07/14 12:41, Qihong Lin wrote: >> >> I'm making documentation in git wiki: >> [1] >> https://github.com/confidencesun/marmotta/wiki/GSoC-2014-Project-(MARMOTTA-444) >> [2] https://github.com/confidencesun/marmotta/wiki/Developer-Documentation >> [3] https://github.com/confidencesun/marmotta/wiki/User-Documentation > > > Perfect. Try to evolve as much as possible that documentation to start to > prepare the final report. > > A conclusions chapter from your since would be nice. Think about what > aspects are interesting to discuss. > > Taking a quick look to dev documentation, there is one aspect I'd like to > hear from you about the mapping of method. If what changes in the new > alternative CDI service is just the invocations to the RepositoryConnection > (I'd need to check the diff to really assert that), would it still make > sense to you to provide an alternative CDIservice? Or would be more > maintainable to move the translation into an RepositoryConnection wrapper or > something like that? Think about that, write down your conclusions, and > ideally provide a proof-of-concept implementation. > > >> Currently, the SPARQL implementation is up to date to the ldp and >> develop branches. I'll make the translations soon after any new >> changes from upstreams, and report to you in time. > > > Probably we'll finally do it early next week. I'll keep you informed. > > > Cheers, > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 660 2747 925 > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co > w: http://redlink.co
