On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Something I started thinking about and ta da...it's been proposed before -- > > http://markmail.org/message/gjvwudqnzejlzynz > > In my mind, we could use some assistance in the maintenance of the > toolkit for our UI instead of continuing to do it ourselves. This said, > I know next to nothing about QT and from what I've seen, the licensing > is pretty complicated and might not work for the ASF -- I have been working with Qt for many years and have in one project made a converter from something similar to our UI descriptions to a Qt environment. I can only recommend such a step. As a side remark, translations will become a factor easier, because the are stored in their own fileset, meaning we only need to compile once for all languages. rgds jan i > > http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/licensing.html#licenses-used-in-qt > > Main web site -- http://qt-project.org/ > > Thoughts? > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "There's a bit of magic in everything, > and some loss to even things out." > -- Lou Reed > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > <javascript:;> > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
