PR 159 seems like a fairly big patch to me. And quite recent, so its impact on the scheduling is not clear. It may also depend on other changes that may have gotten into the DAGScheduler but not pulled into branch 0.9. I am not sure it is a good idea to pull that in. We can pull those changes later for 0.9.2 if required.
TD On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>wrote: > Forgot to mention this in the earlier request for PR's. > If there is another RC being cut, please add > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/159 to it too (if not done > already !). > > Thanks, > Mridul > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Tathagata Das > <tathagata.das1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Since the release of Spark 0.9, we have received a number of important > bug > > fixes and we would like to make a bug-fix release of Spark 0.9.1. We are > > going to cut a release candidate soon and we would love it if people test > > it out. We have backported several bug fixes into the 0.9 and updated > JIRA > > accordingly< > https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-1275?jql=project%20in%20(SPARK%2C%20BLINKDB%2C%20MLI%2C%20MLLIB%2C%20SHARK%2C%20STREAMING%2C%20GRAPH%2C%20TACHYON)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed) > >. > > Please let me know if there are fixes that were not backported but you > > would like to see them in 0.9.1. > > > > Thanks! > > > > TD >
