Thanks, Sean! Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote on 09/25/2015 06:35:46 AM:
> From: Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> > To: Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com>, Richard Hillegas/San > Francisco/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: "dev@spark.apache.org" <dev@spark.apache.org> > Date: 09/25/2015 07:21 PM > Subject: Re: [Discuss] NOTICE file for transitive "NOTICE"s > > Work underway at ... > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10833 > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8919 > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Update: I *think* the conclusion was indeed that nothing needs to > > happen with NOTICE. > > However, along the way in > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-226 it emerged that the > > BSD/MIT licenses should be inlined into LICENSE (or copied in the > > distro somewhere). I can get on that -- just some grunt work to copy > > and paste it all. > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > >> Richard, > >> > >> Thanks for bringing this up and this is a great point. Let's start another > >> thread for it so we don't hijack the release thread. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Richard Hillegas <rhil...@us.ibm.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Under your guidance, I would be happy to help compile a NOTICE file > >>> > which > >>> > follows the pattern used by Derby and the JDK. This effort might proceed > >>> > in > >>> > parallel with vetting 1.5.1 and could be targeted at a later release > >>> > vehicle. I don't think that the ASF's exposure is greatly increased by > >>> > one > >>> > more release which follows the old pattern. > >>> > >>> I'd prefer to use the ASF's preferred pattern, no? That's what we've > >>> been trying to do and seems like we're even required to do so, not > >>> follow a different convention. There is some specific guidance there > >>> about what to add, and not add, to these files. Specifically, because > >>> the AL2 requires downstream projects to embed the contents of NOTICE, > >>> the guidance is to only include elements in NOTICE that must appear > >>> there. > >>> > >>> Put it this way -- what would you like to change specifically? (you > >>> can start another thread for that) > >>> > >>> >> My assessment (just looked before I saw Sean's email) is the same as > >>> >> his. The NOTICE file embeds other projects' licenses. > >>> > > >>> > This may be where our perspectives diverge. I did not find those > >>> > licenses > >>> > embedded in the NOTICE file. As I see it, the licenses are cited but not > >>> > included. > >>> > >>> Pretty sure that was meant to say that NOTICE embeds other projects' > >>> "notices", not licenses. And those notices can have all kinds of > >>> stuff, including licenses. > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > >>> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org >
