@Sean Owen, Thanks for attention this. I agree with you, it's probably not very appropriate to say 'support arm from 3.0 release'. How about change to the word "Spark community supports fully tests on arm from 3.0 release"? Let's try to think about it from the user's point of view than developer，users have to know exactly whether spark supports arm well and wheter spark fully tests on arm. If we specify spark is fully tests on arm, I believe users will have much more confidence to run spark on arm.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:05 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not against it, but the JIRAs will already show that the small > ARM-related difference like floating-point in log() were resolved. > Those aren't major enough to highlight as key changes in the 2000+ > resolved. it didn't really not-work before either, as I understand; > Spark isn't specific to an architecture, so I don't know if that > situation changed materially in 3.0; it still otherwise ran in 2.x on > ARM right? It would imply people couldn't use it on ARM previously. > You can certainly announce you endorse 3.0 as a good release for ARM > and/or call attention to it on user@. > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:01 PM bo zhaobo <bzhaojyathousa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi @Sean Owen , > > > > Thanks for reply. We know that Spark community has own release date and > plan. We are happy to follow Spark community. But we think it's great if > community could add a sentence into the next releasenotes and claim "Spark > can support Arm from this release." after we finish the test work on ARM. > That's all. We just want a community official caliber that spark support > ARM for attracting more users to use spark. > > >
