+1 (non-binding)

1. Verify binary checksums and signatures.
2. Check  kubernetes and pyspark documentation
3. Verify K8S integration test on aarch64
4. Verify customized scheduler and volcano integration test with Volcano
1.5.1.


On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 3:43 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1.
>
> I double-checked the following additionally.
>
> - Run unit tests on Apple Silicon with Java 17/Python 3.9.11/R 4.1.2
> - Run unit tests on Linux with Java11/Scala 2.12/2.13
> - K8s integration test (including Volcano batch scheduler) on K8s v1.24
> - Check S3 read/write with spark-shell with Scala 2.13/Java17.
>
> So far, it looks good except one flaky test from the new `Row-level
> Runtime Filters` feature. Actually, this has been flaky in the previous RCs
> too.
>
> Since `Row-level Runtime Filters` feature is still disabled by default in
> Apache Spark 3.3.0, I filed it as a non-blocker flaky test bug.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-39386
>
> If there is no other report on this test case, this could be my local
> environmental issue.
>
> I'm going to test RC5 more until the deadline (June 8th PST).
>
> Thanks,
> Dongjoon.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 1:33 PM Sean Owen <sro...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 looks good now on Scala 2.13
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 9:51 AM Maxim Gekk
>> <maxim.g...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
>>> Apache Spark version 3.3.0.
>>>
>>> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time June 8th and passes if a
>>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.3.0
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>
>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.3.0-rc5 (commit
>>> 7cf29705272ab8e8c70e8885a3664ad8ae3cd5e9):
>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.3.0-rc5
>>>
>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.3.0-rc5-bin/
>>>
>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>>
>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1406
>>>
>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.3.0-rc5-docs/
>>>
>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.3.0 can be found at the following URL:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12350369
>>>
>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.3.0-rc5.
>>>
>>>
>>> FAQ
>>>
>>> =========================
>>> How can I help test this release?
>>> =========================
>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>> reporting any regressions.
>>>
>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>>>
>>> ===========================================
>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.3.0?
>>> ===========================================
>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.3.0 can be found at:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target
>>> Version/s" = 3.3.0
>>>
>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>>> appropriate release.
>>>
>>> ==================
>>> But my bug isn't fixed?
>>> ==================
>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>>> help target the issue.
>>>
>>> Maxim Gekk
>>>
>>> Software Engineer
>>>
>>> Databricks, Inc.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to