Thanks Dongjoon for opening a jira to track this issue. I agree this is a
flaky test. I have seen the flakiness in our internal tests. I also agree
this is a non-blocker because the feature is disabled by default. I will
try to take a look to see if I can find the root cause.

Thanks,
Huaxin

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:43 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1.
>
> I double-checked the following additionally.
>
> - Run unit tests on Apple Silicon with Java 17/Python 3.9.11/R 4.1.2
> - Run unit tests on Linux with Java11/Scala 2.12/2.13
> - K8s integration test (including Volcano batch scheduler) on K8s v1.24
> - Check S3 read/write with spark-shell with Scala 2.13/Java17.
>
> So far, it looks good except one flaky test from the new `Row-level
> Runtime Filters` feature. Actually, this has been flaky in the previous RCs
> too.
>
> Since `Row-level Runtime Filters` feature is still disabled by default in
> Apache Spark 3.3.0, I filed it as a non-blocker flaky test bug.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-39386
>
> If there is no other report on this test case, this could be my local
> environmental issue.
>
> I'm going to test RC5 more until the deadline (June 8th PST).
>
> Thanks,
> Dongjoon.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 1:33 PM Sean Owen <sro...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 looks good now on Scala 2.13
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 9:51 AM Maxim Gekk
>> <maxim.g...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
>>> Apache Spark version 3.3.0.
>>>
>>> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time June 8th and passes if a
>>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.3.0
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>
>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.3.0-rc5 (commit
>>> 7cf29705272ab8e8c70e8885a3664ad8ae3cd5e9):
>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.3.0-rc5
>>>
>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.3.0-rc5-bin/
>>>
>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>>
>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1406
>>>
>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.3.0-rc5-docs/
>>>
>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.3.0 can be found at the following URL:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12350369
>>>
>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.3.0-rc5.
>>>
>>>
>>> FAQ
>>>
>>> =========================
>>> How can I help test this release?
>>> =========================
>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>> reporting any regressions.
>>>
>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>>>
>>> ===========================================
>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.3.0?
>>> ===========================================
>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.3.0 can be found at:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target
>>> Version/s" = 3.3.0
>>>
>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>>> appropriate release.
>>>
>>> ==================
>>> But my bug isn't fixed?
>>> ==================
>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>>> help target the issue.
>>>
>>> Maxim Gekk
>>>
>>> Software Engineer
>>>
>>> Databricks, Inc.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to