+1 Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> 于2024年4月1日周一 08:07写道：
> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also > simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature > without needing to wait for Pyspark to release. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple, >>> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark >>> Connect initial discussion .. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ? >>>> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have >>>> missed this … >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Mridul >>>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee >>>> <haejoon....@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI >>>>>> (Spark Connect) >>>>>> >>>>>> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540> >>>>>> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053> >>>>>> SPIP doc >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>
