+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:19 AM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2024 10:06:14 AM
> *To:* Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr>
> *Cc:* Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org>; Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org>;
> Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>; dev <dev@spark.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark Connect)
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote:
>
> +1(non-binding) I add to the difference will it make that it will also
> simplify package maintenance and easily release a bug fix/new feature
> without needing to wait for Pyspark to release.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 4:56 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 10:31 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Oh I didn't send the discussion thread out as it's pretty simple,
> non-invasive and the discussion was sort of done as part of the Spark
> Connect initial discussion ..
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 1:59 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Can you point me to the SPIP’s discussion thread please ?
> I was not able to find it, but I was on vacation, and so might have
> missed this …
>
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:08 PM Haejoon Lee
> <haejoon....@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 10:15 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Pure Python Package in PyPI (Spark
> Connect)
>
> JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47540>
> Prototype <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45053>
> SPIP doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pund40wGRuB72LX6L7cliMDVoXTPR-xx4IkPmMLaZXk/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>
> Thanks.
>
>

Reply via email to