On 4/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Separately, I'm ready (gulp!) to start moving Shale towards Maven2, and > it's > > recommended soure directory organizations ... as long as you > > have-a-clue-about-Maven gurus promise to stand by my side and help :-). > > Of course. :) > > > I > > had a question about the "resources" directories in the organization > > recommended by Maven. Does that include resource bundles for > localization > > (which are normally placed somewhere in the "src/java" hierarchy > currently), > > or is it just for "configuration" files? > > Maven's recommended directory structure is src/main/java for .java > files, and src/main/resources for everything else. With that, no > configuration is necessary. > > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html > > If you prefer to keep .properties files in with the source code, it > takes some <resource> sections in the pom to get them included in the > jar. Example: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action/trunk/core/pom.xml > > > It shouldn't be too hard to remodel the existing organization and update > the > > relevant Ant build.xml files, as a move towards forwards compatibility > with > > the recommended structure. > ... > > But it makes a lot of sense to > > migrate the internal organization of the Shale source repositories now, > to > > make the ultimate conversion easier. Anyone else who wants to help in > this > > is, of course, welcome to have at it. > > The major change is splitting core-library into multiple modules, one per > jar.
Which is the reason I've been resisting so far ... :-) I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of these artifacts (although probably two sets ... I got a suggestion to split the APIs that are interesting to application developers from the "internal" APIs for those extending the framework, and would like to produce two sets of javadocs with their appropriate packages. Are you planning to keep the Ant build after Maven 2 is in place? Ideally, no ... it's hard enough to keep one build environment in sync with reality. But we'll probably need some user feedback before decomissioning the Ant scripts. -- > Wendy Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
