Hi Nilla

According to our off-line meeting, you agreed to change the original
proposal and select a new project from the our project list , Did you able
to find a project , if not, please do so as soon as possible, since GSOC
codding already started therefore we have to do it at least before end of
this week

Thanks and Regards
/Jasintha


On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Nila <tharshay...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I apologize for the delayed response.
>
> Last few days and on, I'm under severe medication and cornered with my
> academic semester's final exams.
>
> Despite of that, I'm really glad and excited regarding my selection. I'm
> expecting to learn a lot via delivering my best and looking forward to
> work with you.
>
> The exams would be over by May 21st, but I try my best to involve in this
> 'community bonding' and gain guidance from you.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Regards,
> Tharshayene Loganathan
> Undergraduate,
> Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering,
> IIT,Sri Lanka.
>
>
>
>
> On 21 March 2014 23:27, Nila <tharshay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The updated and corrected proposal has been submitted. The  Google
>> Document is attached below.
>>
>> Pardon me for requesting suggestions on the very last day.
>>
>> Please provide feedback regarding the proposal which would be very
>> helpful for me the future programs.
>> Did I got all wrong, I really wonder. :(
>>
>> This is my first ever GSoC attempt and a feedback really helps.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>>  GSoC Proposal 2014: "UI Testing Framework for Developer 
>> Studio"<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ffx6aDJNM0D5HUwgLoVk5jbT8mCi1uIpWGMzy9q14AQ/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Tharshayene Loganathan
>> Undergraduate,
>> Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering,
>> IIT,Sri Lanka.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 March 2014 19:34, Nila <tharshay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've shared my proposal with you (can comment).
>>>
>>> Please provide me your valuable suggestions and corrections so I could
>>> further improve and submit by tonight.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>  GSoC Proposal 2014: "UI Testing Framework for Developer 
>>> Studio"<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ffx6aDJNM0D5HUwgLoVk5jbT8mCi1uIpWGMzy9q14AQ/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tharshayene Loganathan
>>> Undergraduate,
>>> Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering,
>>> IIT,Sri Lanka.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21 March 2014 11:30, Nila <tharshay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Krishantha,
>>>>
>>>> I've gone through the Robot Framework but I'm afraid that the
>>>> comprehensive widget support for SWT and GMF is less and it's at its
>>>> initial stages.
>>>>
>>>>  As you have mentioned the Robot Framework provides and External
>>>> Eclipse Library [1] [2], which is based on the SWTBot and it's seems to be
>>>> a better framework in terms of less manual work once setup, compared to
>>>> using the SWTBot directly.
>>>>
>>>> But under the 'Eclipse Library Limitations' section [3] it's been
>>>> stated that only the simple and basic SWT widgets are supported for the
>>>> time being.
>>>>
>>>> As the ESB plugin requires GMF Editor Testing, still I'm not completely
>>>> sure on to what extent the SWTBot itself supports GMF. It seems to be
>>>> supporting GEF and few popular blog articles state that via the extended
>>>> GEF support it supports GMF as well. Thus it could be a limitation as well
>>>> even when the SWTBot itself is used.
>>>>
>>>> Thus adding an additional wrapper on top of the SWTBot (the Robot
>>>> Framework), could be a nightmare when it comes to the major concern, 'the
>>>> range of supported widgets'.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I'll be considering and would try to incorporate the Robot
>>>> Framework once I get more control and understanding of this project and
>>>> thank you for this valuable suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> Refs:
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://robotframework.org/#test-libraries
>>>>
>>>> [2] http://code.google.com/p/robotframework-eclipselibrary/
>>>>
>>>> [3] http://code.google.com/p/robotframework-eclipselibrary/wiki/Concept
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tharshayene Loganathan
>>>> Undergraduate,
>>>> Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering,
>>>> IIT,Sri Lanka.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21 March 2014 11:07, Nila <tharshay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Jasintha,
>>>>>
>>>>> as far as I understood, the Jiras contain pluggins (zipped code) those
>>>>> seems to be testing each plugin set of the Developer Studio and POM files
>>>>> are setup which contains Developer Studio plugin dependencies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately I couldn't get any of them running, yet. But I got hints
>>>>> and the basic idea of what am I supposed to do.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll be finishing a draft version of the Proposal around 3.00 pm (UTC
>>>>> + 5.30) and would share the doc link with you. Please review it and assist
>>>>> me via you valuable suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 

*Jasintha Dasanayake*

*Senior Software EngineerWSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com/>lean
. enterprise . middleware*


*mobile :- 0711368118*
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to