On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:41:30PM +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > Then I'm glad there is absolutely no plan to preempt flatpack > technical assessment by shipping one or more GNOME apps as > flatpack-only, leaving Fedora users for whom flatpack does not work > yet behind, and bypassing distribution consensus processes.
Please tone this inflammatory rhetoric down. It's not helpful. When you said you wanted this part of the thread to close, I thought that's what you meant and took it seriously. Here, I assume you're talking about no one having packaged GNOME Recipies (apparently _written_ as a Flatpak proof of concept) in traditional RPM form. But, we can't make *any* upstream author package their stuff in RPM for us. But, if you want that as an RPM in Fedora, _no one is really stopping you_. Go for it! If you're talking about something else here, then I missed it completely and encourage you to be more straightforward and stick to the technical. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
