On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: >> >> Absolutely not. >> >> josh > > > If it breaks the Negativo repo, then yes it is. The Nvidia driver from that
No, it's really not. > repo is supported and it needs to not break. We've been super super lenient That's a completely untenable position. There is only one kernel for all the Editions. There will be times where the kernel needs to be updated to fix a CVE and it breaks the nVidia driver. There is no way you can hold the entire distro hostage to an out-of-tree *proprietary* driver. > with allowing kernel updates in the Workstation product, since it seems to > be working well for everyone involved, but that would need to be > reconsidered if a kernel update intentionally breaks an important subset of > our users. (Note: we only support Nvidia if installed from the Negativo > repo, not from anywhere else.) No, you misunderstand. Nobody intentionally broke nvidia. It happens during the normal course of development because nvidia is out-of-tree and the upstream project does not preserve ABI. This is the price a driver pays for being out of tree. The only viable solution is to get the driver upstream, which is not likely to happen. > It sounds like patches are already available, so it shouldn't be a huge > problem to get the Nvidia package updated. Great. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
