On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 01/30/2018 11:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >> >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for >> s390x = >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Atomic_Cloud_and_Docker_images_for_s390x >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Sinny Kumari <sinnykumari AT fedoraproject DOT org> >> >> >> This change is to bring s390x architecture closer to other Fedora >> architectures by adding widely used Fedora variants. This includes >> docker images, Atomic Host (iso, qcow2 and raw format) and regular >> Cloud Images (qcow2 and raw format). >> >> >> == Detailed Description == >> We already ship Atomic, Cloud and Docker images on other 64-bit Fedora >> supported architectures- aarch64, x86_64 and ppc64le. With Fedora 27, >> s390x is part of primary koji build system. Currently, we only ship >> Server and Everything variants for s390x. So, our next steps should be >> to have missing Fedora variants on s390x architecture which users will >> find useful. This brings in shipping Atomic, Cloud and Docker images >> in Fedora for s390x as well. >> >> >> == Scope == >> * Proposal owners: >> These are isolated changes which doesn't impact existing Fedora 28 >> release plan on s390x. To have these changes ready to ship in Fedora >> 28, we mainly require s390x koji builders configured to run these >> composes, changes in pungi configuration [ >> https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/496 ] to enable the >> additional compose and fixing s390x specific issues encountered when >> compose fails to run. >> >> * Other developers: >> Changes in Fedora infrastructure configs/scripts will be required to >> have s390x builders configured to run additional composes. Fedora >> Infrastructure issue [ >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6659 ] has been filed to >> keep track of required changes to be done. >> >> * Release engineering: >> #Releng 7286: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7286 >> >> * Policies and guidelines: >> N/A (not a System Wide Change) >> >> * Trademark approval: >> N/A (not needed for this Change) > > > You mean OCI Images...
Mostly likely, yes. Relatedly, has there been a change request to move the default container runtime to cri-o or runc or rkt or anything other than docker in Fedora Atomic? If so, that will be neat and I'm sorry I missed it. If not, why not? josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
