On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:55:49PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > The dist-git is now emitting the messages via fedmsg. Whenever new upload 
> > > has been done.
> > > As fedmsg is dead (long live fedora-messaging), I wonder if someone is 
> > > actually consuming those messages? Should we
> > > migrate the code? Or is it save to drop this functionality?
> > >
> > > If I did not get any response I will propose to drop this functionality 
> > > in upstream.
> >
> > It does bring an element of auditability.
> > If we ever need it, we should be able to track back who uploaded what and 
> > when
> > using these messages.
> >
> > So I'd be +1 to keeping them.
>
> I'd really suggest they be migrated to fedora-messaging?
>
> Or if thats too specific perhaps we could come up with a more generic
> call there to a number of messaging systems (depending on how you
> configure it?).
>

Is there a way to trivially consume information reliably and
anonymously with the AMQP fedora-messaging? It was stupid easy to do
so with the ZeroMQ fedmsg system, and it's quite handy for triggering
events on my side based on events in Fedora infrastructure.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to