On 10/22/20 8:27 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:10:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> I do think we need to make it easier for a Fedora package maintainer to >> get the gcc-11 bits so that if there's a need to debug a bad interaction >> between gcc-11 and a package they can. >> > gcc-11 was built into a side tag. Each build target has a repository in Koji. > This one is > <http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/eln-build-side-32479/latest/$basearch>. > > If you worry about ELN-Fedora compatibility, create a new side tag intheriting > from f34 and rebuilt gcc-11 there. Or build a module that anyone interested > can enable on his system.
Sorry, I wasn't terribly clear. So last year when I was testing gcc-10 against Fedora one of the recurring issues we had was that if I needed input from a package maintainer on an issue flagged by gcc-10 we had no good way for the package maintainer to get gcc-10 rpms to do any investigation on their own. With the gcc-11 side tag build and eventual landing in ELN that issue should be much better. So if I need to sync with a package maintainer on an issue, we have a way to make that happen. Of course, dropping gcc-11 into rawhide earlier helps this issue too :-) Jeff _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
