On 24. 06. 21 11:16, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
## Choosing git forge to host source-git repositories We need to find a home for all the source-git repositories. This is actually a really hard task because we have many options (github.com, gitlab.com, pagure.io, src.fedoraproject.org, something custom or on-premise) and different expectations: some projects already have repos set up on different platforms while Pagure is the primary forge now. Since the CPE team is investigating GitLab as a forge, it's even harder for us to figure out the primary forge. We may end up supporting both actually: pagure.io and gitlab.com. What are your thoughts on this topic? Would you prefer pagure.io or gitlab.com More info: * https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issue/1 * https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issue/7
I would expect that since the soruce git is just an intermediate thing, supporting "any forge" is nice to have, but hard. I'd start with some common options (Pagure + 1 other) and see where you'll get.
## High-level workflow proposal up for review Hunor proposed a high-level workflow linked below and I strongly recommend reading it. We have also started discussing many details in the process, such as getting archives: should we generate one from the source-git repo or use the official release archive from upstream?
One thing to consider is that the upstream tarballs might be cryptographically signed and packages should verify the signature in %prep.
-- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
